Click here to edit contents of this page.
Click here to toggle editing of individual sections of the page (if possible). Watch headings for an "edit" link when available.
Append content without editing the whole page source.
Check out how this page has evolved in the past.
If you want to discuss contents of this page - this is the easiest way to do it.
View and manage file attachments for this page.
A few useful tools to manage this Site.
See pages that link to and include this page.
Change the name (also URL address, possibly the category) of the page.
View wiki source for this page without editing.
View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout).
Notify administrators if there is objectionable content in this page.
Something does not work as expected? Find out what you can do.
General Wikidot.com documentation and help section.
Wikidot.com Terms of Service - what you can, what you should not etc.
Wikidot.com Privacy Policy.
yes, this is a good idea.. +1
otherwise you need to store every image on its own page and show it with ListPages.. - also a horror to shift the images
Service is my success. My webtips:www.blender.org (Open source), Wikidot-Handbook.
Sie können fragen und mitwirken in der deutschsprachigen » User-Gemeinschaft für WikidotNutzer oder
im deutschen » Wikidot Handbuch ?
Several years back my site actually tried having each image get uploaded to a separate page, then displayed the gallery with listpages. This allowed for a deep level of control and interaction (images could be ordered random, have a perPage limit, could each have their own comments, and even other things like ads could be integrated into the gallery. We did this for thousands of images. Unfortunately, this was a nightmare in terms of user-friendliness since it is a very manual process to add images, so we went with a standard gallery for it's simplicity. People expect galleries to 'just work', so the simple approach was far better and more popular. I think the only downsides on Wikidot in terms of images are: 1.) the lack of a native automatic fullscreen HD image viewer (think Google+, Flickr) (medium size jpgs on the lightbox doesn't cut it in a time where we have 4k monitors and beyond). 2.) images are treated too much like files (no built in sorting, commenting, etc) rather than being considered as a separate entity. Again, I know this isn't solely a photosharing site, but it's something to think about when 'being more than just a wiki' :)
hello,
thanks, feedback +1
idea ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_loading
https://github.com/vvo/lazyload
http://www.appelsiini.net/projects/lazyload