I really like the data field type "raw", because it allows users to use includes and modules in the data field (as they can already do when not using data forms).
Data forms are have made organizing pages a breeze, with inbuilt user input validation techniques and general UI for wikis. Retaining the raw field type as it is means we have the best of both worlds: normal pages and organized ones.
My wish is that the “experimental” raw type becomes a permanent feature that we can rely on.
+1
~ Leiger - Wikidot Community Admin - Volunteer
Wikidot: Official Documentation | Wikidot Discord server
I definitely agree with this.
Timothy Foster - @tfAuroratide
Auroratide.com - Go here if you're nerdy like me
What about having %%data_raw{field}%% to work on "text" fields instead?
Piotr Gabryjeluk
visit my blog
If it genuinely performs the same function, and that is the way you would like to go about it, then sure :)
λ James Kanjo
Blog | Wikidot Expert | λ and Proud
Web Developer | HTML | CSS | JavaScript
Implemented.
Timothy Foster - @tfAuroratide
Auroratide.com - Go here if you're nerdy like me
Thankyou Timothy, for tagging this page as completed. However, I would like for the Wikidot team to confirm that this is a permanent feature first:
λ James Kanjo
Blog | Wikidot Expert | λ and Proud
Web Developer | HTML | CSS | JavaScript